Litigations involving the company

Grigorishin Litigation. In February 2014, the Company was served in Cyprus with an interim order of the District Court of Nicosia (the “Order”). The Order was obtained by Mr. Konstantin Grigorishin and certain other plaintiffs against a number of defendants, including the Company, certain of its shareholders and directors, and Bank of New York (Nominees) Limited. Among other things, the Order froze property of most of the defendants, including the Company, but excluding Bank of New York (Nominees) Limited and two other defendants, for an amount up to EUR 400 million.

In April 2014, following prior written and oral submissions against the Order by the Company and several other defendants, the District Court of Nicosia discharged the Order in full, including in respect of the Company and its shareholders and directors. As far as the Company is aware, since then the plaintiffs have taken no substantive steps to proceed with their claim against the Company or its directors.

The Company strongly rejects the plaintiffs’ claims and allegations against the Company as groundless. The Company will continue to defend vigorously its position in this on-going litigation.

Tsoy Litigation. In late June 2014, the Company’s shareholder, German Tsoy, and his holding company, Acura Global Limited (BVI), launched an action in the District Court of Nicosia against a number of defendants, including certain other shareholders and directors of the Company. The plaintiffs have initiated this litigation purportedly as a derivative action seeking damages “for the benefit of” the Company “and/or” its majority shareholder, H.M.S. Technologies Limited. As such, no claims have been asserted directly against the Company by the plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs also applied to the Court for interim measures including an application for a freezing order (the “Application”) against the defendants, but not the Company. The Company and certain of its shareholders and directors opposed the Application. In late March 2015, following prior written submissions against the Application, the plaintiffs withdrew the Application, but not the main action itself.

The plaintiffs also applied to the Court for interim measures including an application for a freezing order (the “Application”) against the defendants, but not the Company. The Company and certain of its shareholders and directors opposed the Application. In late March 2015, following prior written submissions against the Application, the plaintiffs withdrew the Application, but not the main action itself.

In late September 2015, the plaintiffs submitted the statement of claim in this on-going litigation. The Company carefully reviewed this statement of claim, with assistance from its Cyprus and international counsel. On its face, the statement of claim does not raise any new material allegations or claims compared to prior submissions by the plaintiffs in relation to their withdrawn Application.

Previously, the Company’s non-defendant directors, namely, Messrs. Philippe Delpal, Gary S. Yamamoto, Andreas S. Petrou and Nikolai N. Yamburenko, who make up the majority of the Company’s Board of Directors, carefully considered the plaintiffs’ claims and allegations, obtained legal advice from the Company’s lawyers, and unanimously concluded that the plaintiffs’ allegations are entirely meritless. The Company’s non-defendant directors will continue to defend vigorously the Company’s position in this on-going litigation.

In late April 2016, the Company and certain other defendants submitted their statements of defence in this on-going litigation.

Your page has been added successfully. Please click on "My Annual Report" () to see your selection.
Link für Popup
Scroll Top